Nine Images: Comparison

I cannot be clear enough. I do not wish to impose costs (i.e. harm) upon any person without damn good reason. I want a safe world where people, especially children can explore, grow and have fun in comfort and safety. If I ever have hurt I should make reparations.

I wish to compare the crime to which I pleaded guilty in April 2020 and the costs (i.e. harm), with driving. I am not counting personal offence; that rests in people’s heads, and if people are offended by concepts, those costs are merely a construct of the mind, like getting stiff about people using certain words, not wearing a hijab, performing witchcraft, supporting Celtic or being Jewish. Haters gotta hate. The first question is the exception. I will ask the question, and in the following three columns give either a YES or NO answer. These answers, for the sake of simplicity, are ‘generally’. There will no doubt be exceptions to the rule. I can only speak for my own offence and ones very similar too it. My offence was ‘making indecent images of children’. According to the forensic report (Comissioned by the police) I had never accessed those images for the 20 months they had been on a hard drive. I want to imagine. Say I did exactly the same thing again. Transferred 9 image files off some drive, saved them to another drive and never looked at them. Say I looked at them every day?? What would the damge be compared to driving perfectly legally, and driving illegally?, for example speeding or having worn tyres. Please think about it.

A comparison of electronic storing of images with driving 9 Pictures Driving
Legally Illegally
Is one racked with guilt? Yes No No
Does one injure/kill others? No Yes Yes
Does one produce dangerous carbon monoxide? No Yes Yes
Does one produce dangerous volatile organic compounds? No Yes Yes
Does one produce dangerous sulphur oxides? No Yes Yes
Does one produce dangerous nitrogen oxides? No Yes Yes
Does one produce dangerous particulates? No Yes Yes
Does one add to the catastrophic levels of Carbon Dioxide? No Yes Yes
Is one noisy? No Yes Yes
Does one create damaging vibration? No Yes Yes
Are wars fought to support the activity? No Yes Yes
Does the activity increase the risk of spreading infections? No Yes Yes
Does the activity demand several square metres of public space? No Yes Yes
Does the activity induce public expenditure on building and maintaining infrastructure? No Yes Yes
Does the activity kill animals? No Yes Yes
Does the activity kill plants? No Yes Yes
Does one force people to modify their behaviour? No Yes Yes
Does one result in epidemic health problems through exercise reduction? No Yes Yes
Does one trash sites of historical, ecological value? No Yes Yes
Does one create congestion, ergo time loss and associated stress? No Yes Yes
Does one facilitate crime? No Yes Yes
Can you cripple a person for several months before they die without ever recovering and then be short listed for BBC Sports Personality Of the Year? No Yes Yes
Is the activity cool with people, ergo, Are normal relationships maintained with family, friends and associates? No Yes Yes
Does one make rich people richer? No Yes Yes
Does one make poor people poorer? No Yes Yes
Does one get subsidised No Yes Yes
Are minor infractions tolerated No Yes Yes
Is one able to continue a normal productive life after activity No Yes Yes
Is the activity encouraged No Yes Meh

Jeez, I'm sorry, but four years into this stupid thing and it seems like the zealots are not going to give up.